Draft Discussion Paper: Consistency in Applying Queensland's EMR Removal Framework This paper explores how uncertainty regarding the interaction between the EP Act, ASC NEPM, Auditor Handbook and DETSI guidance may contribute to inconsistent contaminated land outcomes. Using PFAS as a case study, it examines the role of statutory definitions, risk assessment and professional judgement, and argues that similar sites should not reach materially different outcomes solely becaus

In Queensland, contaminated land auditors fill the role of independent certifiers of contaminated land investigations and related work on...